http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml;jsessionid=DLV22JAEMAXUTQFIQMFCFFOAVCBQYIV0?xml=/news/2007/04/18/ndrugs18.xmlwhat annoys me about articles like this is they talk about how unfair it is to use cognitive enhancers in school tests,
but they always miss the idea of absorption of information. That, if you’re taking these enhancers, that you are more likely to pay attention, understand, and be motivated and focused enough to actually get the information into your head. i.e. your education is actually more effective - something far different from cheating.
What I’m getting at is, that you are still learning. It’s not unfair. It’s education.
Just like the “unfairness” contrasting a student in a university, and a kid in some backwater town going to school in a 'dirt hut'.
What
is unfair is cheating on an exam (i.e. using information you do not in fact posses, or would lose very quickly afterwards).
Theoretically, you should be able to stop taking the cog-drugs before an exam, and still be just as smart, unless there’s a withdrawal effect that changes your mental performance...
Anyway, I think the base idea of these drugs is great... as long as there’s no side effects or loss of information after you stop taking them. Hopefully they're just a better 'funnel' for the info.